On the cover of David Icke's latest book, The David Icke Guide To The Global Conspiracy, Icke prints a quote from John Lennon where Lennon noted that he believed the world is ruled by insane people for insane agendas and what's most insane is that he could be put away in a mental institution for publicly speaking out. Sadly, Lennon was instead assassinated after beginning to speak out.
The US government now continues its descent into fascism with laws claiming to prevent violent radicalism and domestic terrorism being thinly veiled schemes to justify tyrannical oppression of dissent against the criminal and inhuman action of the government. Only a handful of congressmen have stood up against such measures... and the 2 who did that are running for president - Ron Paul & Dennis Kucinich - continue to be marginalized by the criminal elite owned mass media.
There is much for us to learn from these circumstances. The general public can learn to be more responsible about who they choose or allow to have power over their lives. Those in power can learn how destructive their efforts to expand their own control will be. This also can help us see the potentials for tyrannical behavior within each of us. It has been observed that in a society dominated by psychopaths the people tend to become increasingly sociopathic as a survival mechanism. We tend to adapt to our social environment, and our own desire for success in society will often lead us toward unethical behaviors if society rewards those behaviors. If society is to overcome the insanity of the ruling class it must first overcome naivety about the dark nature of those in control. People who have mainly benevolent motives and intentions have to recognize that there are other people who have very depraved or greed-based intentions. By facing that reality, people can stop enabling their oppressors and take action to reclaim their power.
Monday, December 10, 2007
Thursday, October 25, 2007
Mass treason in U.S. Congress
Showing their total disregard for the U.S. Constitution and the freedom of Americans, all but a tiny fraction of the U.S. House of Representatives have passed a "thought crime" law that claims to be a tool to help thwart "violent radicalization" and "home-grown terrorism."
A writer at an online news analysis site has reviewed it here:
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=4682
There are more than enough laws already to prosecute crimes, but this new legislation is clearly designed to give tyrants leeway to bring charges against dissidents even if those dissidents haven't taken any illicit or disruptive action. Merely speaking in support or sympathy toward any radical group or action, particularly one with any history of violence, could land you in trouble with the feds. Watch out Bill Maher, your joke about the courage of Islamic men flying planes into the WTC could put you in Guantanamo even though there's no credible evidence Islamic men actually were the ones piloting planes into the twin towers.
Promoting violence to accomplish any political or social objective could be labeled as supporting terrorism... so any gang activity, robbery, or even child abuse and corporal punishment could be labeled terrorist activity... these are all involving some "social" objective, right? Do Congresspersons actually read these laws? Yes, a handful of Representatives voted against it and some were not present or chose not to vote. Republican Jeff Flake voted against it as did Democrat Dennis Kucinich, but the vote was a bipartisan landslide in favor of turning the federal government into the thought police.
Ron Paul, the Texas Congressman who did not vote on this bill, has been persistent in not voting for laws that violate the Constitution. He has just introduced the American Freedom Agenda Act to reverse many of the abuses of power by the Executive Branch that have been allowed by laws pushed through Congress during Bush's Administration. It would repeal the Military Commissions Act and restore Habeus Corpus. I bet we'll see a similar overwhelming consensus by Congress against Paul's bill as they showed in favor of the thought crime bill.
America, if you are ignorant enough to keep electing these fools and scoundrels to represent you then you will have no one to blame but yourselves when the destruction of the American Republic becomes fully visible.
A writer at an online news analysis site has reviewed it here:
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=4682
There are more than enough laws already to prosecute crimes, but this new legislation is clearly designed to give tyrants leeway to bring charges against dissidents even if those dissidents haven't taken any illicit or disruptive action. Merely speaking in support or sympathy toward any radical group or action, particularly one with any history of violence, could land you in trouble with the feds. Watch out Bill Maher, your joke about the courage of Islamic men flying planes into the WTC could put you in Guantanamo even though there's no credible evidence Islamic men actually were the ones piloting planes into the twin towers.
Promoting violence to accomplish any political or social objective could be labeled as supporting terrorism... so any gang activity, robbery, or even child abuse and corporal punishment could be labeled terrorist activity... these are all involving some "social" objective, right? Do Congresspersons actually read these laws? Yes, a handful of Representatives voted against it and some were not present or chose not to vote. Republican Jeff Flake voted against it as did Democrat Dennis Kucinich, but the vote was a bipartisan landslide in favor of turning the federal government into the thought police.
Ron Paul, the Texas Congressman who did not vote on this bill, has been persistent in not voting for laws that violate the Constitution. He has just introduced the American Freedom Agenda Act to reverse many of the abuses of power by the Executive Branch that have been allowed by laws pushed through Congress during Bush's Administration. It would repeal the Military Commissions Act and restore Habeus Corpus. I bet we'll see a similar overwhelming consensus by Congress against Paul's bill as they showed in favor of the thought crime bill.
America, if you are ignorant enough to keep electing these fools and scoundrels to represent you then you will have no one to blame but yourselves when the destruction of the American Republic becomes fully visible.
Monday, October 15, 2007
Allegiance to Truth - the pledge few make
If we examine the great dearth of truth and integrity in our society we'll notice that it is fueled by psychological factors that inhibit individual thinking and promote seeking acceptance from social groups. Notice how people are excellent at pointing out faults in other ethnic groups, other religions, and other political factions than the ones they themselves belong to. Yet, they ususally choose to ignore or deny accurate criticisms of groups that they identify with. It's a gang-type mentality that co-exists with the desire for belonging that gives people a sense of security.
Doctors routinely ignore the truth that standard treatment approaches are not in the best interests of patients, motivated by unwillingness to admit they are harming others and by the financial rewards given to those who play along with the pharmaceutical dominated system.
Voters routinely ignore the truth that they are supporting gangsters who run for office when those gangsters pretend to support the views of a certain political orientation.
Media persons ignore the truth that they are parroting lies since they get rewards and promotions for telling the stories that are consistent with the establishment agendas and they face demotion or job loss if they share some truly inconvenient truths.
Make no mistake, when you are committed to the truth it will put you at odds with people and institutions around you. You will have to face your fears of not belonging, of not being accepted. It's a choice that can either empower your spirit or leave you subservient to the will of others and to group-think mentality of herds.
The challenges of our civilization test your spirit to see how committed to the truth you really are!
Doctors routinely ignore the truth that standard treatment approaches are not in the best interests of patients, motivated by unwillingness to admit they are harming others and by the financial rewards given to those who play along with the pharmaceutical dominated system.
Voters routinely ignore the truth that they are supporting gangsters who run for office when those gangsters pretend to support the views of a certain political orientation.
Media persons ignore the truth that they are parroting lies since they get rewards and promotions for telling the stories that are consistent with the establishment agendas and they face demotion or job loss if they share some truly inconvenient truths.
Make no mistake, when you are committed to the truth it will put you at odds with people and institutions around you. You will have to face your fears of not belonging, of not being accepted. It's a choice that can either empower your spirit or leave you subservient to the will of others and to group-think mentality of herds.
The challenges of our civilization test your spirit to see how committed to the truth you really are!
Monday, September 24, 2007
They want to believe - American idiots
It's really fascinating how gullible many people are. Just see how people accept what they are told on television. They are shown false recordings of Osama Bin Laden to convince them that Islamic fanatics wish to attack America (when Osama & those terrorists have been created and managed by Western intelligence operatives). The Islamic terror networks funding can ultimately be traced to the same people and institutions that control the US Government, so the war on terror is a fraud with puppets giving menacing statements toward one another and having ignorant followers of these puppets slaughter each other in the belief they are protecting their way of life from an outside enemy.
The strategy of the devious controllers of civilization has always been divide and conquer. The art of controlling a society always involves deception and psychological warfare, for those who are most enslaved are the ones who falsely believe they are free. Americans go to vote for people like 9/11 coverup co-conspirators Rudy Giuliani and Hillary Clinton and believe they are promoting change when they are just helping decide which puppet of the same crime syndicate will be shown on their TV screens. How many bother to research what those sociopathic political actors have actually done and who they've associated with? Most people would rather listen to a few propaganda sources that tell them what they wish to hear... some fantasy that someone like Hillary will make the world a better place (even though she has voted in the past for aggressive war and has helped direct companies that sell weapons to oppressive regimes which US leaders then denounce and threaten war with... and not to mention her closeted sexual activities and financial crimes, her disdain for free speech as evidenced by her conspiring to keep non-establishment candidates like Kucinich out of debate forums).
Just as children want to believe in Santa Claus in spite of the logical absurdity of the story and the lack of evidence to confirm the story of the guy with flying reindeer visiting millions of homes in a single night, most Americans who vote want to believe that the media ordained candidates are an exception to the regular lies and deceptions offered by high level politicians... that these people will promote the public's interests even though they are heavily funded by corporations and institutions that exploit and fleece the public.
People call it a conspiracy theory when you point out indisputable facts such as the membership of most prominent politicians in secretive organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and Bilderberg Group, as well as masonic orders, including Skull & Bones at Yale University where the 2004 US major party candidates were both initiates. People often believe America has been ruled by Christians, yet haven't a clue what meanings are present in all the occult symbols on their government issued money that they handle every day (pyramids, owls, eagles, the numbers 13 and 33... since when are these considered meaningful to Christians?)
People typically want to believe the fairy tales and illusions they are given about society and its leaders, as the truth would be very uncomfortable and people don't like to admit that their "parents" are abusers and that they have condoned or allowed the abuse to persist. Here, "parents" refers to authority figures and leaders in general, who psychologically represent parent figures in the public's minds. People have a hard time looking at their parent figures in a balanced manner. They may idealize and ignore the negative qualities that are present or they may overfocus on the negative and then seek to escape from dealing with the dark aspects of what they encounter... some people refuse to watch TV or refuse to vote to avoid dealing with the negative. The dark elites are happy for people who are aware of their activities to not vote and to take their attention away from the reality of the world. If you don't focus your attention and project your intent you can't foster change. That makes the global shadow elites' "great work" easier, for their attention and intention have been focused for a long time.
The strategy of the devious controllers of civilization has always been divide and conquer. The art of controlling a society always involves deception and psychological warfare, for those who are most enslaved are the ones who falsely believe they are free. Americans go to vote for people like 9/11 coverup co-conspirators Rudy Giuliani and Hillary Clinton and believe they are promoting change when they are just helping decide which puppet of the same crime syndicate will be shown on their TV screens. How many bother to research what those sociopathic political actors have actually done and who they've associated with? Most people would rather listen to a few propaganda sources that tell them what they wish to hear... some fantasy that someone like Hillary will make the world a better place (even though she has voted in the past for aggressive war and has helped direct companies that sell weapons to oppressive regimes which US leaders then denounce and threaten war with... and not to mention her closeted sexual activities and financial crimes, her disdain for free speech as evidenced by her conspiring to keep non-establishment candidates like Kucinich out of debate forums).
Just as children want to believe in Santa Claus in spite of the logical absurdity of the story and the lack of evidence to confirm the story of the guy with flying reindeer visiting millions of homes in a single night, most Americans who vote want to believe that the media ordained candidates are an exception to the regular lies and deceptions offered by high level politicians... that these people will promote the public's interests even though they are heavily funded by corporations and institutions that exploit and fleece the public.
People call it a conspiracy theory when you point out indisputable facts such as the membership of most prominent politicians in secretive organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and Bilderberg Group, as well as masonic orders, including Skull & Bones at Yale University where the 2004 US major party candidates were both initiates. People often believe America has been ruled by Christians, yet haven't a clue what meanings are present in all the occult symbols on their government issued money that they handle every day (pyramids, owls, eagles, the numbers 13 and 33... since when are these considered meaningful to Christians?)
People typically want to believe the fairy tales and illusions they are given about society and its leaders, as the truth would be very uncomfortable and people don't like to admit that their "parents" are abusers and that they have condoned or allowed the abuse to persist. Here, "parents" refers to authority figures and leaders in general, who psychologically represent parent figures in the public's minds. People have a hard time looking at their parent figures in a balanced manner. They may idealize and ignore the negative qualities that are present or they may overfocus on the negative and then seek to escape from dealing with the dark aspects of what they encounter... some people refuse to watch TV or refuse to vote to avoid dealing with the negative. The dark elites are happy for people who are aware of their activities to not vote and to take their attention away from the reality of the world. If you don't focus your attention and project your intent you can't foster change. That makes the global shadow elites' "great work" easier, for their attention and intention have been focused for a long time.
Monday, July 2, 2007
Use Your Illusion - The Pentagon Magic Show
Of all the mysteries and inconsistencies regarding the events of 9/11/2001, one of the most widely debated is the Pentagon attack site. Recent evidence and testimony seem to shed some light on this subject. Researchers at Pilots For 911 Truth (www.pilotsfor911truth.org) and The Pentacon (www.thepentacon.com) have discovered that the NTSB government flight path data of the plane they claim hit the Pentagon actually shows the plane coming towards the Pentagon from a different direction than what would be consistent with the downed light poles and other evidence. Furthermore, it shows the plane too high to have hit the Pentagon, and therefore flying just above the Pentagon. Eyewitnesses who claim to have seen a plane resembling a 757 also report it's path coming from a different direction than the official story.
Remember, there are dozens of video camera recordings that were confiscated by the FBI and so far only a few bits of video showing nothing recognizable have been released. These videos can have no relevance to national security (in the sense the public would normally understand "national security") and must logically be classified to provide security to those within the government involved in the events of 9/11. The Pentacon site provides an insightful summary of different aspects of how illusions are generated by prestidigitators (magicians). It fits the Pentagon scenario into that model, showing how smooth timing and distractions were used to deceive witnesses into thinking they saw a commercial jet hit the Pentagon, while a smaller military aircraft/missile struck the Pentagon and a fireball explosion created shock and hid the flyby of the plane that created the illusion.
The 9/11 events were both a magick ritual and a magical illusion... filled with occult symbolism and numerology and multiple layers of deception to mislead the public about how the attacks were perpetrated and who were the grand architects of those events. When people attend magician's performances they expect to be deceived and shown a trick they can't understand (though they may enjoy the challenge of trying to discern how the tricks are carried out). When people watch real life events and TV news they just don't expect to be subjected to deception and don't consider it when interpeting what they perceive. That makes it even easier for the magicians to be successful! When your audience isn't expecting a trick it's easier to get away with some imperfections in your performance. On 9/11 that was essential, since the architects of the attacks/magick show could not control everything that their audience might perceive. Over time more and more holes in the illusions have been exposed and more and more people are waking up to conclude they were conned.
Rather than becoming resentful toward the black magick performers and their minions it might be wise to ask ourselves if we've all chosen to immerse ourselves in illusions to challenge ourselves to see through them... in all aspects of our lives. If we can recognize that, then we can appreciate the role the agents of the "dark side" play in our reality. We are each extensons of the One Infinite Creator exploring life and evolving through the myriad experiences of the physical realm. Death itself is an illusion, so those who "die" in Earth tragedies have merely crossed the veil back into a realm that's a bit closer to the awareness of Infinity.
Remember, there are dozens of video camera recordings that were confiscated by the FBI and so far only a few bits of video showing nothing recognizable have been released. These videos can have no relevance to national security (in the sense the public would normally understand "national security") and must logically be classified to provide security to those within the government involved in the events of 9/11. The Pentacon site provides an insightful summary of different aspects of how illusions are generated by prestidigitators (magicians). It fits the Pentagon scenario into that model, showing how smooth timing and distractions were used to deceive witnesses into thinking they saw a commercial jet hit the Pentagon, while a smaller military aircraft/missile struck the Pentagon and a fireball explosion created shock and hid the flyby of the plane that created the illusion.
The 9/11 events were both a magick ritual and a magical illusion... filled with occult symbolism and numerology and multiple layers of deception to mislead the public about how the attacks were perpetrated and who were the grand architects of those events. When people attend magician's performances they expect to be deceived and shown a trick they can't understand (though they may enjoy the challenge of trying to discern how the tricks are carried out). When people watch real life events and TV news they just don't expect to be subjected to deception and don't consider it when interpeting what they perceive. That makes it even easier for the magicians to be successful! When your audience isn't expecting a trick it's easier to get away with some imperfections in your performance. On 9/11 that was essential, since the architects of the attacks/magick show could not control everything that their audience might perceive. Over time more and more holes in the illusions have been exposed and more and more people are waking up to conclude they were conned.
Rather than becoming resentful toward the black magick performers and their minions it might be wise to ask ourselves if we've all chosen to immerse ourselves in illusions to challenge ourselves to see through them... in all aspects of our lives. If we can recognize that, then we can appreciate the role the agents of the "dark side" play in our reality. We are each extensons of the One Infinite Creator exploring life and evolving through the myriad experiences of the physical realm. Death itself is an illusion, so those who "die" in Earth tragedies have merely crossed the veil back into a realm that's a bit closer to the awareness of Infinity.
Saturday, June 30, 2007
NYC Photography Ban? Cui Bono?
Current news reports from the New York Times state that the city of New York wishes to ban all public filming and photography done without a permit from the city. This is curious considering how ubiquitous camera devices are, including cellular phone cameras. This ban would obviously be tyrannical and would be an attempt to give the city control over all visual media recording in New York City. What do they wish to hide from the public? Since it would be unrealistic to enforce such a ban except in sporadic instances, it seems likely that the ban would be used to punish and intimidate independent journalists who gain footage of city corruption or anything the public is expected to be in the dark about.
If we look back to 9/11/2001 we can see how citizen filming puts the establishment control of information at risk. It could give us unadulterated footage to show what aircraft actually struck the WTC towers and the Pentagon, when and where there were explosions at those locations, and how public officials responded to the supposedly unforeseen tragedy. Remember the Booker Elementary video of George W. Bush sitting silently listening to children read while NYC & Washington D.C. were apparently under attack and the President was at an unsecured location? That footage set off warning lights in many minds about Bush Administration complicity in the events of 9/11. The media coverage of the 9/11 events as they happened was much more revealing than what was reported days later when anything not in line with the official lies was censored. All reports of bombs going off and the appearance of controlled demolition at the WTC were silenced while conflicting eyewitness accounts of the aircraft were soon filtered to ensure only statements supporting the official story were reported; so then the only question for the media to debate would be how soon should the USA attack Afghanistan.
It's amazing how governing bodies constantly seek to give themselves monopolies by taking rights away from citizens and reserving those rights for themselves. This includes restrictions on private arms possession, monetary instruments, surveillance, drugs, and education. Yes, you even need government approval to home school your children since they can't have you teaching your kids subversive ideas about subjects such as science and history. Governments now wish to place surveillance cameras all over the place but want to fine you and confiscate your camera if you are filming without their permission.
What are Americans celebrating this July 4th? Oh, Independence Day... it seems that many Americans don't really understand what independence means and will happily shoot off government approved Chinese-manufactured fireworks to express their mistaken belief that they are free. Perhaps government cameras won't catch them if it happens to be the case that the devices they detonate aren't authorized by the state.
If we look back to 9/11/2001 we can see how citizen filming puts the establishment control of information at risk. It could give us unadulterated footage to show what aircraft actually struck the WTC towers and the Pentagon, when and where there were explosions at those locations, and how public officials responded to the supposedly unforeseen tragedy. Remember the Booker Elementary video of George W. Bush sitting silently listening to children read while NYC & Washington D.C. were apparently under attack and the President was at an unsecured location? That footage set off warning lights in many minds about Bush Administration complicity in the events of 9/11. The media coverage of the 9/11 events as they happened was much more revealing than what was reported days later when anything not in line with the official lies was censored. All reports of bombs going off and the appearance of controlled demolition at the WTC were silenced while conflicting eyewitness accounts of the aircraft were soon filtered to ensure only statements supporting the official story were reported; so then the only question for the media to debate would be how soon should the USA attack Afghanistan.
It's amazing how governing bodies constantly seek to give themselves monopolies by taking rights away from citizens and reserving those rights for themselves. This includes restrictions on private arms possession, monetary instruments, surveillance, drugs, and education. Yes, you even need government approval to home school your children since they can't have you teaching your kids subversive ideas about subjects such as science and history. Governments now wish to place surveillance cameras all over the place but want to fine you and confiscate your camera if you are filming without their permission.
What are Americans celebrating this July 4th? Oh, Independence Day... it seems that many Americans don't really understand what independence means and will happily shoot off government approved Chinese-manufactured fireworks to express their mistaken belief that they are free. Perhaps government cameras won't catch them if it happens to be the case that the devices they detonate aren't authorized by the state.
Sunday, June 17, 2007
Problem, Reaction, Solution... It's SiCKO!
Michael Moore has a new film being released called "Sicko" about the corruption present in America's health care system. His focus is on manage care companies and how they profit along with pharmaceutical companies while patients don't get adequate coverage and are often bankrupted or die as a result of the insurance system. Moore is promoting the idea of a universal health care system managed by the government as a way to repair the practice of health care. He even derisively airs clips of Ronald Reagan attacking socialist health care plans and criticizes Hillary Clinton for backing away from the socialist health care issue after being rewarded financially by the health insurance industry.
The situation in America has indeed gotten increasingly worse, but that may merely be pushing Americans more earnestly toward accepting a supposed solution that actually decreases their health care choices and ensures that harmful treatments are given to even more people than before, thus giving even greater profits to pharmaceutical corporations. If health care continues to promote toxic therapies that help foster illness then everyone is being forced to pay for their neighbors to be kept ill. If I know safe natural, inexpensive therapies to heal cancer why should I give tax dollars to have the government fund treatments that poison people? We need health freedom, not a unification of illness maintenance organization. Current coverage pays for toxic drugs but not safe, effective nutritional supplements. Why should intelligent people wish to make that system universal?
Once again, Michael Moore presents some useful information in a context designed to mislead us. Fahrenheit 911 promoted the fiction that Arabs were the perpetrators of 9/11, and SiCKO promotes the fiction that Universal Insurance coverage will lead to improved health and lowered costs. The corporate profiteering in health care he exposes is just one layer of the problem, not the core layer. The core is the allopathic medical monopoly which was created through government collusion with private business interests. If we don't address the core we are deluding ourselves and allowing the people planning power grabs an opportunity to centralize their management of yet another control system, health care. Michael Moore is a talented documentary maker, but his content is skewed so that the powers governing our society will allow his films to be promoted to the general public, unlike more informative films that are limited to an audience of select Internet viewers and select DVD purchasers.
The situation in America has indeed gotten increasingly worse, but that may merely be pushing Americans more earnestly toward accepting a supposed solution that actually decreases their health care choices and ensures that harmful treatments are given to even more people than before, thus giving even greater profits to pharmaceutical corporations. If health care continues to promote toxic therapies that help foster illness then everyone is being forced to pay for their neighbors to be kept ill. If I know safe natural, inexpensive therapies to heal cancer why should I give tax dollars to have the government fund treatments that poison people? We need health freedom, not a unification of illness maintenance organization. Current coverage pays for toxic drugs but not safe, effective nutritional supplements. Why should intelligent people wish to make that system universal?
Once again, Michael Moore presents some useful information in a context designed to mislead us. Fahrenheit 911 promoted the fiction that Arabs were the perpetrators of 9/11, and SiCKO promotes the fiction that Universal Insurance coverage will lead to improved health and lowered costs. The corporate profiteering in health care he exposes is just one layer of the problem, not the core layer. The core is the allopathic medical monopoly which was created through government collusion with private business interests. If we don't address the core we are deluding ourselves and allowing the people planning power grabs an opportunity to centralize their management of yet another control system, health care. Michael Moore is a talented documentary maker, but his content is skewed so that the powers governing our society will allow his films to be promoted to the general public, unlike more informative films that are limited to an audience of select Internet viewers and select DVD purchasers.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)