Exploiting Climate Change To Further The Global Order

One of the biggest topics discussed in many circles in recent months is the issue of global climate change, often defined as global warming and attributed to human industrial pollution. The film An Inconvenient Truth, which brought former VP Al Gore, Jr. an Academy Award has been a key element in the promotion of this issue. The public debate has been largely delineated between environmentalists and socialist advocates versus the Republicans and big industry in the USA. What most people don't realize is that the financing of the environmentalist movement is managed by the same sources that manage global industries and global banking. This seems to be a staged debate as it's presented across the mainstream media, even though I suspect that most of those talking about the issue from their perspective genuinely believe in their view.

I have read many articles about this topic and find that the theory of man-made global warming is seriously flawed and definitely not an overwhelming consensus among scientists. Even when there is indeed an overwhelming consensus on a topic that involves scientific research and theorizing, the consensus often turns out to be inaccurate. A couple independent critics of the global warming orthodoxy are published at www.nov55.com and www.brojon.org; Ken Adachi at www.educate-yourself.org has a whole section of articles from various sources that refute the claims of the global warming campaigners. There does seem to be evidence that global climate change is occurring, but this is not due to CO2 and not a phenomenon exclusive to Earth in the solar system. Changes are occurring throughout our solar system and researchers exploring hyperdimensional energy transfer (David Wilcock at www.divinecosmos.com and Richard Hoagland at www.enterprisemission.com are publishing details about this) explain this as associated with energy influx corresponding with natural energy cycles.

The solutions provided to allegedly ameliorate climate change involve global restrictions and global taxes... key components of the agenda to create a global government. These restrictions will be economically disadvantageous to many but will benefit some who are in a position to exploit measures such as carbon credits. As Earth changes and climate change occur the powers that be can use them to terrorize the public into accepting restrictive measures that will allegedly save humanity from the worst of global warming. There's even technologies that can manipulate weather and trigger earthquakes, which can be employed at key times and places to shape public mood and sentiment.

We now have celebrities on the global warming bandwagon, preparing a mega "aid" concert. never mind that the global elites promoting global warming have trillions of dollars at their disposal to fund whatever effort would be needed to deal with a genuine man-made climate issue. No, they don't use their funds other than in token PR-oriented donations to reduce poverty, hunger, or environmental damage. They prefer to offer the public a ritual of entertainment, such as Live Aid, Live 8, and now July 7 (the anniversary of the London false flag subway bombings), to get the public's emotions and donations directed toward a managed deception.

The solution to likely global climate change and food scarcity appears to be stealth depopulation... not reductions in carbon gas emissions or increased use of solar energy. That's not what I'm proposing, it's what the global elite have been planning and implementing in the last few decades. Human fertility is steadily decreasing due to endocrine disrupting chemicals proliferating in the environment. There have even been instances of sterilization components placed in vaccines given to people in impoverished countries. In Africa, HIV was unleashed via WHO vaccine campaigns, while the use of natural treatments to boost the immune system has been suppressed. It is likely that HIV offers a cover story for the reality that people are really dying due to malnutrition and poor living conditions. The procession of wars around the world has ended many lives and soldiers deployed overseas are not at home procreating with their spouses or domestic partners. We have received ongoing propaganda about disease outbreaks... AIDS, Ebola, SARS, and avian flu, for examples. If there is a global epidemic of illness would many people question whether or not it's natural? It's not difficult to use chemical and electromagnetic weapons to impair immune functioning and facilitate mortality from bioengineered microbes. There are now efforts to restrict access to natural health products such as vitamins, herbs, and food extracts. Making it hard for most people to get access to genuine healing aids would be a likely precursor to an attack on human health designed to reduce population.

If people are busy coping with various health and economic problems it will be hard for them to resist being subjected to totalitarian policies and implementation of a freedom-suppressing global governing system. If the population is reduced through wars and diseases then there will be fewer people to control and shepherd into the New World Order that elites have been planning for an indefinite amount of time. The thought of intentional mass killing is abhorrent to most people, yet it is viewed by some as necessary and is consistent with official population reduction policies that have been established by national and international government and policy organizations. Every year in Bohemian Grove in Northern California many of the wealthy and powerful persons of influence have a "Cremation of Care" ritual, to detach from their conscience so they aren't inhibited by it as they carry out the dirty work of creating a global state that gives power and control to those deemed worthy. Those who are oblivious to this can get the video of that event from Alex Jones' Infowars.com or other sites that offer free copies or excerpts of the video. To understand how civilization is managed one has to recognize that the elite managers have been programmed to think in radically different ways than common citizens.

So, returning to the global climate issue, I encourage people to look at the data and arguments without emotional attachment to any position and consider if the promoted hypothesis is valid and if the measures proposed to address it would be effective... and if they have any other implications. I very much support cleaning up our environment and creating a healthier world, but the global warming campaign is a diversion that I find very limited in its support for transforming industries to respect the environment while being aggressive in its support of promoting totalitarian governing systems. That I associate with the plan for having a One World Government and reduced global population. You can't just ask people to support those goals, you have to threaten and deceive them into accepting those agendas and outcomes. The real inconvenient truth is the hidden power structure and its associated agendas on our planet.